Dawson

East Side Union High School District v. Whittle Communications, L. P.

Bad Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 997·28 Cal. App. 4th 998·34 Cal. Rptr. 2d 108·94 Daily Journal DAR 13771·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7585
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 1994H011079California15,744 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bamattre-Manoukian, J.

These appeals require answers to four questions:

(1) Whether the trial court properly rejected the contention of the California Superintendent of Public Instruction, and other plaintiffs, that a public school district may never lawfully contract for classroom display of “Channel One,” a current events video program which contains commercial advertisements;

(2) Whether the trial court correctly concluded that “Channel One” may lawfully be used by a school district only so long as the students are not coerced to view the advertisements;

(3) Whether in the circumstances of record the trial court properly granted injunctive relief which, in practical effect, compelled a school district to adopt, as a condition of continued use of “Channel One,” court-specified procedures by which students could “opt out” by choosing not to watch the programming; and

(4) Whether in the circumstances of record the trial court could properly retain jurisdiction to appoint, without a further showing of need, a qualified individual to monitor the parties’ compliance with the judgment.

We shall conclude that the third and fourth questions must be answered in the negative but shall answer the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.