Dills

Dills v. Redwoods Associates, Ltd.

Bad Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 987·28 Cal. App. 4th 888·33 Cal. Rptr. 2d 838·94 Daily Journal DAR 13671·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7495
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 1994C016304California1,986 words

Opinion

Opinion

Davis, J.

At issue in this case is whether a mobilehome park owner may charge resident mobilehome owners for the cost of capital improvements as a variable-expense item supplemental to a fixed base rent. We hold that nothing in Civil Code section 798.31 (undesignated section references will be to this code) precludes this practice, capital expenses being a traditional component of rent and there being nothing in the statutory language expressing a concern with the way rent itself is structured. Consequently, we shall affirm the judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained the defendants’ demurrer.

I. Background

As we are reviewing a demurrer, we assume the truth of all wellpled facts in the complaint. (Knickerbocker v. City of Stockton (1988) 199 Cal.App.3d 235, 238 [ 244 Cal.Rptr. 764 ].) The pertinent allegations are few.

Plaintiffs Leland L. Dills and Paul Stuart each own mobilehomes located within a mobilehome park owned and operated by the several defendants (whom we shall collectively designate as Redwoods). Plaintiff Dills has resided in the park since 1984, plaintiff Stuart since 1976. On May 1, 1990, plaintiff Dills executed a five-year lease agreement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.