In Re William

Good Law
111 Cal. App. 4th 1464·4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 695
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 2003A099390California2,775 words

Opinion

Opinion

Certified For Partial Publication. [*]

Certiorari Denied May 17, 2004. See 124 S.Ct. 2182 .

POLLAK, J.

William V. appeals from a judgment of the juvenile court making him a ward of the court for unlawfully possessing a knife on school grounds. He asserts that the court should have suppressed the knife because it was seized in an unlawful search. William argues that the specially assigned police officer who conducted the search was not a school official and thus was required to have probable cause, rather than merely a reasonable suspicion, to conduct the search. In the published portion of the opinion, we hold that the police officer, who was on a two-year assignment as a resource officer at William's school, was a school official for purposes of the Fourth Amendment, and that his search was justified by the reasonable suspicion that William was engaging in conduct that violated school rules.

William also challenges the gang-related conditions of his probation. In the unpublished portion of the opinion, we conclude the probation conditions are valid. Accordingly, we affirm.

Around 9:15 a.m. on September 6, 2001, Officer David Johannes of the Hayward Police Department entered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.