DACHINO

People v. DACHINO

Good Law
111 Cal. App. 4th 1429·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1440·2003 Daily Journal DAR 10609·4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 691·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8514
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 2003B161828California1,627 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

At a hearing on a suppression motion, a police officer testifies that he searched defendant and found a gun in his waistband. The defendant has standing to contest the legality of the search, even though he denies the search took place.

Jules Frank Dachino appeals a judgment after conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon (Pen. Code, § 12021, subd. (a)(1)) with findings that he suffered six prior serious or violent felony convictions (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)). The court sentenced him to 33 years to life in state prison. We conclude the trial court erred by ruling that Dachino lacks standing to challenge the search and seizure of evidence. (Pen. Code, § 1538.5.) We reverse and remand with instructions.

FACTS

Dachino moved to suppress a handgun and other evidence police officers obtained during a search. At the suppression hearing, Officer Shawn Hetherington testified that he and partner Officer Blanca Lopez saw Dachino driving his car at an “unsafe speed,” which he estimated to be 35 miles an hour in a 25-miles-an-hour residential zone. Dachino drove his car into the driveway of an apartment complex. Hetherington and Lopez…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.