Garcia

People v. Garcia

Good Law
111 Cal. App. 4th 715·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1309·2003 Daily Journal DAR 9686·3 Cal. Rptr. 3d 895·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7763
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 26, 2003B159701California3,228 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grignon, J.

The police obtained a search warrant for a business establishment that was open to the public, based on sales from the establishment of methamphetamine by an individual who was neither an owner nor an employee of the business establishment. We conclude the search warrant was facially invalid. When a search warrant for a business establishment open to the public is based on the sale of controlled substances by a target who is neither an owner nor employee of the establishment, the affidavit submitted in support of the warrant must establish probable cause to believe controlled substances will be found at the business establishment. The sale of controlled substances alone is insufficient, because there is no probable cause to believe the controlled substances are stored in the business establishment rather than on the person or in the possession of the target. We conclude further, however, that the police relied in good faith on the search warrant. We affirm.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant and appellant Victoria Garcia was charged with possession of methamphetamine in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11377, subdivision (a) and possession of a smoking device in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.