Gonzalez

Gonzalez v. Paradise Valley Hospital

Good Law
111 Cal. App. 4th 735·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1311·2003 Daily Journal DAR 9740·3 Cal. Rptr. 3d 903·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7765
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 26, 2003D039962California2,549 words

Opinion

Opinion

McCONNELL, J.

Plaintiffs Arturo A. Gonzalez and Maria D. Gonzalez áppeal summary judgments for defendants Paradise Valley Hospital (the Hospital) and Jon E. Highum, M.D. The Gonzalezes sued the defendants for professional negligence, arising from the death of their son Arturo Gonzalez (Arturo) after he escaped from the Hospital’s psychiatric unit during an involuntary 72-hour hold under Welfare and Institutions Code section 5150. The Gonzalezes contend the trial court erred by ruling that under this court’s opinion in Heater v. Southwood Psychiatric Center (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 1068 [ 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 880 ] (Heater), section 5278 immunizes the defendants from any breaches of the applicable standards of care during the detention. We agree with the Gonzalezes, based on our recent holding in Jacobs v. Grossmont Hospital (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 69 [ 133 Cal.Rptr.2d 9 ] (Jacobs), and reverse the judgments. We conclude section 5278 provides no immunity for negligence during a 72-hour hold.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Arturo had a history of paranoid schizophrenia. On the evening of September 26, 1999, Arturo, after a period of not taking his medication, attempted to choke his mother.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.