Williams v. Superior Court

Good Law
4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 62
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 8, 2003429858California2,808 words

Opinion

Opinion

James D. Fox, District Attorney, and Rebecca Baum, Deputy District Attorney, for real party in interest.

QUENTIN L. KOPP, J.

This matter represents petitioner's third mandamus petition in the instant criminal action. We apply an existing rule of law to a set of facts significantly different from those stated in published opinions.

Petitioner was charged with violating Health and Safety Code section 11377, subdivision (a) by unlawfully possessing a controlled substance commonly called "MDMA." The complaint was filed on December 17, 2001. After arraignment, she filed a demurrer to the complaint, contending possession of MDMA was not a Health and Safety Code section 11377, subdivision (a) violation. The demurrer was overruled by respondent court on March 1, 2002. Petitioner then sought a writ of mandate/prohibition from this court, arguing that respondent court exceeded its jurisdiction in erroneously denying the demurrer and that the complaint failed to provide petitioner with adequate notice as to the unlawful act of which she was charged. This court granted the writ, commanding the real party in interest the People to file an amended complaint.

On May 20, 2002, the People…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.