Gray

BRANDON G. v. Gray

Good Law
111 Cal. App. 4th 29·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1213·2003 Daily Journal DAR 8924·3 Cal. Rptr. 3d 330·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7156
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 8, 2003A099014California4,632 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stein, J.

Patricia Gray, an attorney, appeals from a judgment awarding her former client, Mr. G., as guardian ad litem for his two children (plaintiffs), the sum of $41,724.40 on Mr. and Mrs. G.’s action against Gray for legal malpractice. Plaintiffs also have appealed from the judgment, contending the trial court erred in calculating the damages owed by Gray.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In December 1992, Mr. and Mrs. G. enrolled their children in the KidStop daycare facility in Sonoma County, operated by Donna and Phillip Moore. Before enrolling the children, Mr. and Mrs. G. checked with the County of Sonoma Social Services Department (the County) and were told that KidStop was licensed, no complaints had been made about it, and it appeared to be a good daycare facility. This information was a factor in Mr. and Mrs. G.’s decision to enroll their children at KidStop. On June 14, 1993, their older child reported that Phillip Moore had sexually molested her. Their other child was too young to communicate his own experiences, but the older child reported that Phillip Moore had not molested him. In July 1993, the younger child saw a newspaper photograph of Moore and reacted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.