Johnson v. County of Fresno

Good Law
111 Cal. App. 4th 1087·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1371·2003 Daily Journal DAR 10073·4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 475·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8123
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 2003F041054California2,635 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiseman, J.

Getting a grasp of this case requires a trip through a procedural maze culminating in a non intuitive result, a journey for which we beg the reader’s indulgence. Christina Johnson filed a complaint against the County of Fresno (County) and one of its employees, Michael Stribling, alleging claims for sexual harassment, negligence and other torts. Stribling worked for the County’s Department of Health and was Johnson’s treating counselor. Alleging that Stribling made sexual advances toward her (among other things), Johnson filed a complaint against the County and Stribling. The County denied Stribling any defense, reasoning that he acted outside the course and scope of his employment. On the day set for the hearing of the County’s motion for summary judgment on this issue, Johnson dismissed the County out of the lawsuit, with prejudice. Johnson later entered into a stipulated judgment in the amount of $165,000 with Stribling, who, predictably, admitted his contact with Johnson occurred during the course and scope of his employment with the County. The errant employee, Stribling, then assigned to Johnson his right to pursue indemnification from the County. Johnson then filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.