Freeman

Freeman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Good Law
111 Cal. App. 4th 660·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1300·2003 Daily Journal DAR 9661·3 Cal. Rptr. 3d 860·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7717
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 25, 2003E032585California3,801 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gaut, J.

Plaintiff Michael D. Freeman appeals judgment entered in favor of defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart), after the trial court sustained Wal-Mart’s demurrer and motion for summary judgment.

This action arises from plaintiff suing Wal-Mart for charging customers a service fee if they do not use their Wal-Mart shopping cards within 24 months. Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that the service fee is unconscionable and thus unlawful under Civil Code section 1770, subdivision (a)(19) of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act. Plaintiff also alleges the service fee violates section 1749.5 and thus constitutes an unfair business practice under Business and Professions Code section 17200.

On appeal plaintiff argues the trial court erred in sustaining Wal-Mart’s demurrer as to plaintiff’s first cause of action for violation of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act. Plaintiff claims that not only did the trial court err in finding the service fee term was not unconscionable, but in addition, plaintiff should have been given an opportunity to present evidence on the matter.

As to the court’s summary judgment ruling, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in finding that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.