Yang

Lee v. Yang

Good Law
111 Cal. App. 4th 481·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1276·2003 Daily Journal DAR 9370·3 Cal. Rptr. 3d 819·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7482
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 19, 2003A097959California8,093 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reardon, J.

While the legal issues in this case are all about the money, the heart of the matter is a romantic relationship and engagement turned sour upon the prospective bride’s discovery of her betrothed’s prior undisclosed homosexual liaisons. With that the parties’ mutual trust and expectations for a life together came to an end. Promises had been made, funds had been commingled, a residence had been purchased and the bride-to-be had left her lucrative Hong Kong job and relocated to San Francisco. Both parties sued after the wedding was cancelled. Many issues were decided on summary judgment. Cutting through the evasive, self-serving testimony that followed in the court trial, the court concentrated on documentary evidence. In the end, neither party prevailed on their claims for damages, although plaintiff and appellant Holden H. Lee was awarded the diamond engagement ring. We affirm the judgment in its entirety.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

A. The Relationship

With a master’s degree in business administration from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Holden has worked in Hong Kong and the United States in the fields of development and private investment. Defendant and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.