In Re Humberto O.

People v. Humberto O.

Good Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 317·2000 Daily Journal DAR 4375·80 Cal. App. 4th 237·95 Cal. Rptr. 2d 248·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3266
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 26, 2000B124161California2,178 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aldrich, J.

Introduction

The People appeal from the judgment dismissing with prejudice the petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) filed against defendant Humberto O., after the trial court granted defendant’s motion to suppress (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 700.1) a dagger found during the search of his backpack. We hold that the search of the backpack worn by defendant at the time of his arrest under Education Code section 48264 for truancy was lawful because it was incident to defendant’s arrest. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

On February 26, 1998, at 9:15 a.m., three Los Angeles Police Officers who were on juvenile patrol in Hollywood saw defendant walking down the street several miles from Hollywood High School. Suspecting defendant was a truant because of his youthful appearance, backpack, proximity to a school during school hours, the officers stopped him. Defendant told the officers that he attended Hollywood High School. Familiar with the Los Angeles Unified School District’s track system, the juvenile duty officers ascertained that defendant was “on track,” which meant that he was supposed to be in school at the time he was stopped. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.