Johnson v. Superior Court

Caution
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 390·2000 Daily Journal DAR 5242·80 Cal. App. 4th 1050·95 Cal. Rptr. 2d 864·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3918
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 18, 2000B137002California7,899 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mallano, J.

Introduction

Petitioners Diane L. Johnson and Ronald G. Johnson, along with their minor daughter Brittany L. Johnson, filed an action against real parties in interest, California Cryobank, Inc., Cappy M. Rothman, M.D., and Charles A. Sims, M.D., claiming that real parties failed to disclose that the sperm they sold came from a donor with a family history of kidney disease called Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD). That sperm was used to conceive Brittany who has been diagnosed with this serious kidney disease. When petitioners sought to take the deposition and obtain documents of John Doe, the person believed to be the anonymous sperm donor, real parties (including John Doe) filed motions to quash the deposition subpoena. At the same time, petitioners filed a motion to compel compliance with the deposition subpoena. The trial court denied petitioners’ motion and granted the motions to quash the deposition subpoena. By their petition, petitioners seek a writ of mandate directing the superior court to vacate its order and issue a different order compelling John Doe’s deposition and the production of records.

The novel issue presented here is whether…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.