Knight

Knight v. Ferguson

Good Law
148 Cal. App. 4th 1082·55 Cal. Rptr. 3d 921
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 22, 2007B194512California2,559 words

Opinion

Opinion

Plaintiff moves to recuse defendants' lawyer in a lawsuit over a partnership and lease agreement. Prior to the lawsuit, the attorney briefly represented plaintiff concerning the possible formation of a partnership and lease agreement with another party involving the same business that is the subject matter of the lawsuit. Plaintiff knew that the attorney had represented the defendants in other matters. Defendants were present at the meetings between plaintiff and the attorney, and privy to all their discussions.

Did the trial court properly disqualify the attorney? Yes. Defendants' presence at meetings between plaintiff and the attorney does not sufficiently attenuate the attorney's conflict. To separate the conflict from the two sets of clients is to separate the silk from the thread. It cannot be done.

Defendants Perry Ferguson and Paula Ferguson appeal an order granting plaintiffs Laura Knight's motion to disqualify the Fergusons' attorney, Richard Wideman. Knight had consulted previously with Wideman about forming a partnership and entering into a commercial lease to establish a new restaurant. The dispute between Knight and the Fergusons concerns that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.