Burch

People v. Burch

Bad Law
148 Cal. App. 4th 862·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 393·2007 Daily Journal DAR 3744·55 Cal. Rptr. 3d 892·2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2906
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2007D049604California4,208 words

Opinion

Opinion

Benke, J.

Robert Franklin Burch was convicted of possession of methamphetamine, count 1, and possession of fictitious bills, count 2. It was also found true he served a term of imprisonment within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b). Burch was sentenced to four years in prison. He appeals, arguing (1) the trial court abused its discretion when denying his request to bifurcate the trial on his prior conviction which resulted in prejudicial error, (2) the trial court prejudicially erred by failing to sua sponte instruct the jury with CALJIC No. 2.02 in regards to count 2, and (3) his federal constitutional rights were violated when sentenced to the upper term without the aggravating factors being found by a jury.

FACTS

A. Prosecution Case

On December 7, 2004, San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department deputies were dispatched to a recreational vehicle park to make contact with appellant, who was visiting a girlfriend. The deputies learned appellant had an outstanding no bail warrant. The deputies arrived and were let into the trailer by appellant’s girlfriend, where they arrested appellant on the warrant. During the arrest, appellant asked to leave his money…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.