Watson

Van Horn v. Watson

Good Law
148 Cal. App. 4th 1013·56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 272
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 21, 2007B188076, B189254California3,359 words

Opinion

Opinion

In these consolidated appeals, the plaintiff Alexandra Van Horn claims that she was severely injured when, after a single vehicle accident, she was negligently removed from the vehicle by the defendant Lisa Torti and, as a result, suffered permanent paraplegia. Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Torti on the ground that Torti was entitled to immunity from liability under Health and Safety Code, section 1799.102 (section 1799.102). [1] The defendant Glen Watson was the driver of the vehicle in which plaintiff was a passenger at the time of the accident. Both he and Torti were sued by plaintiff and each filed cross-complaints against each other. [2] At the time of the accident, Torti was riding as a passenger in a second vehicle driven by the defendant Dion Ofoegbu. They were right behind Watson's vehicle when the accident occurred. Plaintiff, Torti, Watson and Ofoegbu were all friends and had been socializing together in a bar prior to the accident.

As we explain, section 1799.102 has an application only to the rendering of care at the scene of a medical emergency. As the record demonstrates the absence of a medical emergency, Torti was not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.