Stewart

Stewart v. Seward

Good Law
148 Cal. App. 4th 1513·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 453·2007 Daily Journal DAR 4145·56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 651·2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3298
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 28, 2007B190103California4,171 words

Opinion

Opinion

Klein, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Caroline Stewart (Stewart) appeals an order dismissing her complaint following the sustaining without leave of a demurrer interposed by defendant and respondent Shedra K. Seward, administrator of the estate of Wilmer Koontz (administrator).

The essential issue presented is whether the trial court properly found Stewart’s action is barred by the one-year statute of limitations provided in Code of Civil Procedure section 366.3.

We reject Stewart’s theory she was a “creditor” of the estate of Wilmer Koontz (Wilmer) and that, following the administrator’s rejection of her “creditor’s claim,” her cause of action came within the tolled or extended statute of limitations of section 366.2. The trial court properly determined Stewart’s action arose, not from her status as a “creditor,” but from Wilmer’s alleged breach of a “promise or agreement with a decedent to distribution from an estate” within the meaning of section '366.3, subdivision (a) and, accordingly, that the statute’s one-year statute of limitations applied. Because the statute of limitations under section 366.3 began to mn on the day of Wilmer’s death, October 26, 2004, and Stewart did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.