STATE BD. OF CHIRO. EXAM. v. Superior Court

Good Law
148 Cal. App. 4th 142·55 Cal. Rptr. 3d 374
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 2007C052554California8,137 words

Opinion

Opinion

Garcia & Associates, Gaspar Garcia, II, Sacramento, for Real Party in Interest.

Carole M. Arbuckle sued her employer, the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners and its executive director, Jeanine R. Smith (collectively the Board except where context indicates otherwise), alleging adverse employment actions were taken against her in retaliation for her whistle-blower reports, specifically her allegation that a member of the Board allowed the member's own chiropractic license to expire but improperly continued to act as a Board member. Arbuckle first filed a complaint with the State Personnel Board (SPB) but did not request a hearing after receiving an adverse "Notice of Findings" from the SPB executive officer. She then filed this civil tort suit. The Board unsuccessfully moved for summary judgment, arguing this suit was barred for her failure to exhaust administrative and judicial remedies. After the Board petitioned this court for a writ of mandate, we issued an alternative writ and stayed the proceedings.

The adverse notice of findings was deemed to be the final decision of the SPB when it went unchallenged. Had Arbuckle requested a hearing the SPB would either…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.