Robertson

Robertson v. Zolin

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 299·44 Cal. App. 4th 147·51 Cal. Rptr. 2d 420·96 Daily Journal DAR 3837·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2306
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 3, 1996G015350California1,427 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sonenshine, J.

The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) appeals a judgment granting a petition for a writ of mandate ordering it to revoke its suspension of Michael David Robertson’s license for driving while intoxicated. We affirm.

I

On April 12, 1993, at 1:20 a.m., Irvine Police Officer J. M. Gunderson stopped Robertson for driving his truck “against a red light.” Gunderson noticed Robertson’s eyes were bloodshot and he smelled of alcohol beverages. After testing his coordination skills, Gunderson arrested Robertson and administered a breath test.

The first test was given at 2:19 a.m. and showed Robertson’s blood-alcohol content (BAG) was .18 percent. However, the second test, given a minute later, registered “.XX.” At 2:22 a.m., a third test was given, producing another reading of .18 percent. At that point, Gunderson confiscated Robertson’s license and issued him a temporary driving permit.

At the administrative review hearing, the DMV submitted, inter alia, Gunderson’s sworn statement, which included the breath test results. In turn, Robertson introduced a computer-generated document entitled “ADAMS Inquiry,” reflecting various information about the tests. The document also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.