Service by Medallion, Inc. v. Clorox Co.

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 415·44 Cal. App. 4th 1807·52 Cal. Rptr. 2d 650·96 Daily Journal DAR 5260·152 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2500
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 6, 1996H013857California3,688 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elia, J.

Service By Medallion, Inc. (Medallion) appeals from a judgment dismissing its complaint without leave to amend, following an order sustaining the demurrer of defendant Clorox Company. Medallion contends (1) the trial court erred in ruling that the action was preempted by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 United States Code sections 157 and 158, and (2) the third amended complaint adequately stated a cause of action for fraudulent inducement of a contractual relationship. We agree with Medallion’s first contention, but hold nonetheless that the complaint was fatally defective. Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment of dismissal.

Scope of Review

A general demurrer presents the same question to the appellate court as to the trial court—namely, whether the plaintiff has alleged sufficient facts in the complaint to justify relief on any legal theory. (B & P Development Corp. v. City of Saratoga (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 949, 953 [ 230 Cal.Rptr. 192 ].) The reviewing court “gives the complaint a reasonable interpretation, and treats the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded. [Citations.] The court does not, however, assume the truth of contentions,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.