Angeles Chemical Co. v. Spencer & Jones

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 296·44 Cal. App. 4th 112·51 Cal. Rptr. 2d 594·96 D.A.R. 3805·96 Daily Journal DAR 3805
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 2, 1996B088796California4,438 words

Opinion

Opinion

Masterson, J.

In general, claims for negligence and breach of contract involving damage to real property must be brought within three years and four years, respectively, of the date when the plaintiff discovers, or should have discovered, the injury and its cause. However, if the damage is caused by a latent defect in the construction of an improvement to the property, the claim cannot be brought any later than 10 years after the construction is substantially completed, regardless of when the plaintiff discovers the injury. Put another way, actions based on a latent construction defect must be filed, at a minimum, within three or four years of discovery of the injury and its cause (depending on the cause of action), but in no event can they be brought more than ten years after substantial completion of the construction.

Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) ( 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.), the statute of limitations on a state law claim for damage caused by a hazardous substance cannot begin to run until the plaintiff discovers, or should have discovered, the injury and its cause. In other words, CERCLA controls the commencement of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.