Enter. Rent-A-Car Co. of S.F. v. Workmen's Auto Ins. Co.

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 937·58 Cal. App. 4th 1543·68 Cal. Rptr. 2d 725·97 Daily Journal DAR 13823·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8557
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 7, 1997A076034California3,145 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hanlon, J.

Defendant Workmen’s Auto Insurance Company (appellant) appeals from judgment in an action for declaratory relief and reimbursement of defense costs brought by plaintiff Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of San Francisco (respondent). The judgment declared that appellant provided primary coverage for Daniel Mitchell, its insured, in the underlying third party action brought in the Solano County Municipal Court, and that respondent, owner and lessor of the vehicle Mitchell was operating at the time of the accident, provided secondary coverage. It also awarded respondent reasonable defense costs in that action, entitled Payne v. Mitchell (Mun. Ct. Solano County). Appellant contends that a car rental company may not avoid responsibility of providing primary liability insurance coverage by depositing cash pursuant to Vehicle Code section 16054.2, subdivision (a), in lieu of purchasing insurance, and disclaiming coverage in the rental agreement. We disagree with that contention and affirm.

Statement of Facts

The case was tried on stipulated facts which we adopt. Respondent is a duly authorized California corporation engaged in the business of short-term car rentals to the public.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.