Lucas

Lucas v. State of California

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 844·58 Cal. App. 4th 744·68 Cal. Rptr. 2d 253·97 Daily Journal DAR 13195·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8186
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 22, 1997D026856California2,819 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kremer, J.

Plaintiff Michael Lucas appeals a judgment dismissing his lawsuit against defendants State of California, Jose Fernandez, Joseph Cottingham, and C. Lance Barnett (together State) after the superior court sustained without leave to amend the State’s demurrer to his complaint for federal civil rights violation, wrongful termination, and writ of mandate. Concluding Lucas’s complaint alleged facts sufficient to constitute causes of action, we reverse the judgment.

I

Introduction

The State notified Lucas his civil service employment was terminated for cause. Lucas appealed to the State Personnel Board (SPB). While awaiting hearing before the SPB, Lucas applied for and obtained service retirement from the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS). On the date scheduled for the SPB hearing, the State withdrew its disciplinary action against Lucas. Asserting such withdrawal effectively reinstated him to his position, Lucas unsuccessfully sought reinstatement from the State Department of Personnel Administration (Personnel Administration). Lucas then requested a SPB hearing to clear his name and reinstate him. Claiming lack of jurisdiction, the SPB declined.

Lucas filed this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.