Ewing

Ewing v. Gill Industries, Inc.

Good Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 164·3 Cal. App. 4th 601·4 Cal. Rptr. 2d 640·92 Daily Journal DAR 2081·68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1455
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 1992Docket Nos. H007202, H007683California5,543 words

Opinion

Opinion

Agliano, J.

Plaintiff Sam Ewing brought this action against his employer Gill Industries, Inc. (Gill), alleging he was discharged on the basis of age in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.). Gill appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding Ewing $122,850 in damages. Gill also appeals from the order granting Ewing’s motion for attorney’s fees. On appeal, Gill asserts error in exclusion of evidence, jury instructions, failure to grant nonsuit, and amounts of the damage and attorney’s fee awards. For the reasons stated below, we modify the judgment as to the amount of damages. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

Statement of Facts

The evidence in support of the verdict is largely circumstantial. Ewing was born in 1920. He worked for several years in radio broadcasting. In 1969 Gill hired him as a writer, producer and promotion person for television station KNTV, channel 11. On April 3, 1979, Gill made Ewing the director of media services for Gill Cable. Ewing supervised an eight- to ten-person staff. His responsibilities included the following: selection, ordering, scheduling and promotion of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.