Winston

Winston v. Woodward

Good Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 119·3 Cal. App. 4th 361·4 Cal. Rptr. 2d 126·92 Daily Journal DAR 1673·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1058
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 1992B049568California2,373 words

Opinion

Opinion

Klein, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Scott T. Winston (Winston) appeals an order dismissing his action against defendant and respondent Lorene Woodward (Woodward) pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 583.420, subd. (a)(2)(B) and 583.310.

The issue presented is whether the tolling period for judicial arbitration ended with the arbitrator’s order that the matter was not amenable to arbitration and would be restored to the civil active list, or whether the tolling period ended some seven months later, when the matter actually was restored to the civil active list.

Because Winston did not follow up to ensure a prompt restoration of the matter to the civil active list and the setting of a trial date within the five-year period, the failure to bring the matter to trial within five years was the result of Winston’s lack of diligence, rather than impossibility due to nonperformance of official duty. The order therefore is affirmed.

Factual and Procedural Background

On January 9, 1984, Winston filed suit against Woodward for breach of contract, misrepresentation and breach of quiet enjoyment. Winston pied, inter alla, that Woodward breached their contract by cancelling her listing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.