Hayes

People v. Hayes

Bad Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 217·3 Cal. App. 4th 1238·5 Cal. Rptr. 2d 105·92 Daily Journal DAR 2513·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1613
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 1992A051427California3,689 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chin, J.

Scott McKay Hayes appeals from his convictions for spousal rape (Pen. Code, § 262, subd. (a) ), corporal injury to spouse (§ 273.5, subd. (a)), false imprisonment (§ 236), and attempting to dissuade a victim from prosecuting a crime (§ 136.1, subd. (b)(2)), enhanced for a prior prison term (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). He contends that the trial court erred in denying his request for discovery and in excluding at trial evidence relating to the victim’s alleged involvement in prostitution and the parentage of her baby. He also contends that the evidence is insufficient to establish the enhancement for service of a prior prison term. We find merit in appellant’s contention regarding discovery, but find the error harmless except with regard to the spousal rape conviction. Accordingly, we reverse the spousal rape conviction (count 2) and remand to the trial court to determine whether the error requires a new trial on that charge. As to all other counts, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

By information, the Marin County District Attorney charged appellant with corporal injury to a spouse, spousal rape, false imprisonment by violence, and dissuading a victim from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.