Hastings

Hastings v. Department of Corrections

Caution
110 Cal. App. 4th 963·2 Cal. Rptr. 3d 329·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1111·2003 Daily Journal DAR 8128·14 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1149
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 22, 2003C041708California4,891 words

Opinion

Opinion

Blease, J.

Plaintiff Walter W. Hastings appeals from the granting of a summary judgment in favor of defendant California Department of Corrections (CDC or Department) in his suit for discrimination on the basis of his physical disability in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). (Gov. Code, § 12940 et seq.)

On appeal, plaintiff, a probationary candidate for correctional officer, disqualified by reason of knee injuries, contends he is entitled to reassignment to another position within the CDC, such as a data processor, as a reasonable accommodation for his physical disability.

We disagree because the FEHA, read in harmony with the civil service laws, requires accommodation only to a position within the same civil service classification for which he is a candidate. Because plaintiff seeks accommodation by reassignment to a different position within the CDC without complying with the civil service requirements for the position, his action must fail.

We will affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff applied for the position of correctional officer with the CDC. By letter dated January 25, 1995, the CDC gave him a conditional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.