Cdf

San Joaquin Helicopters v. Department of Forestry

Good Law
110 Cal. App. 4th 1549·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1183·2003 Daily Journal DAR 8663·3 Cal. Rptr. 3d 246·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6943
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 2, 2003C041310California5,683 words

Opinion

Opinion

Morrison, J.

San Joaquin Helicopters appeals from denial of its petition for a writ of mandate challenging the validity of an interim contract between State of California (the State) Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF) and DynCorp Technical Services for maintenance services on aircraft used in fighting fires. San Joaquin Helicopters contends CDF and the Department of General Services (DGS) had no authority to enter into the interim contract while its bid protest was pending; the State’s reliance on section 6.05 of the State Contracting Manual to authorize the interim contract was misplaced as the manual was not adopted as a regulation pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act; and Government Code section 14615.1, which purports to exempt DGS from the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act when acting under the State Contracting Manual, is invalid as it was enacted in violation of the single-subject rule of article IV, section 9 of the California Constitution.

We conclude section 6.05 of the State Contracting Manual gave CDF and DGS authority to enter into the interim contract while the bid protest was pending. Government Code section 14615.1 exempted DGS, in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.