Sakiyama

Sakiyama v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.

Good Law
1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 762·110 Cal. App. 4th 398
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 10, 2003B151800California5,959 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ashmann-Gerst, J.

This appeal arises out of a tragic incident. Four teenagers attended an all-night party and then attempted to drive home. Unfortunately, the driver of the vehicle crashed into a tree, killing herself and one passenger and severely injuring the two other passengers. The two injured parties (Shion Sakiyama (Sakiyama) and Julie Kuo (Kuo)) and the parents of the two deceased teenagers (Lynn Chen (Chen) and Suel Lee (Lee)) brought the instant lawsuit against numerous persons, including AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. (AMF), the owner of the facility where the party was held. Appellants theorize that AMF is liable under traditional negligence theories because AMF had a duty not to allow its facility to be used for an all night rave party, an allegedly inherently dangerous event. We disagree. We hold that the trial court properly granted AMF summary judgment because (1) all-night rave parties are not inherently dangerous, and (2) AMF did not have a duty not to allow its facility to be used for such a party, even if it knew or could assume that drugs would be used by some of the attendees.

Moreover, the trial court properly denied appellants’ motion for reconsideration. The motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.