In Re Daniel M.

Suzanne F. Evans, San Diego, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minor.

McCONNELL, J.

Richard S., the alleged father of Daniel M., purports to appeal a judgment terminating his parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. [1] Richard's sole contention is that the juvenile court committed reversible error by not complying with the notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) ( 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.). However, because Richard did not acknowledge or establish his paternity ( 25 U.S.C. § 1903 (9); Cal. Rules of Court, [2] rule 1439(a)(4)), he lacks standing to assert the issue. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

In January 2002, the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (the Agency) removed newborn Daniel from the custody of his mother, Danielle M., because she had a history of drug abuse, admitted using drugs during the pregnancy and tested positive for methamphetamine at the birth. The Agency filed a petition on Daniel's behalf under section 300, which identified Richard as the alleged father. In paternity questionnaires, Danielle and Richard stated he may have American Indian heritage. In its detention report, the…