Lamer

People v. Lamer

Caution
110 Cal. App. 4th 1463·2 Cal. Rptr. 3d 875·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1171·2003 Daily Journal DAR 8597·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6876
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 31, 2003D038958California3,675 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

A jury convicted the defendant, Leslie Allen Lamer, of 12 counts of lewd and lascivious acts on a child under the age of 14, in violation of Penal Code section 288, subdivision (a). The jury also found true all 10 special allegations of substantial sexual contact with a child under the age of 11, within the meaning of Penal Code section 1203.066, subdivision (a)(8). The trial court sentenced Lamer to a total prison term of 28 years. He timely filed an appeal, contending that the trial court erred in: (1) allowing the People to introduce sexual misconduct propensity evidence under Evidence Code section 1108, and instructing the jury regarding this evidence, pursuant to CALJIC No. 2.50.01; (2) admitting two videotapes of the victim children describing the abuse, pursuant to Evidence Code section 1360; and (3) instructing the jury, pursuant to CALJIC No. 2.62, that it could draw unfavorable inferences from Lamer’s failure to explain or deny evidence against him. In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we find no merit in Lamer’s first two contentions. In the published portion, we agree that the trial court improperly gave CALJIC No. 2.62. We conclude,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.