Merced

People v. Merced

Good Law
114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 781·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 3666·2001 Daily Journal DAR 13221·94 Cal. App. 4th 1024·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10637
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 2001A088418California2,923 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kay, J.

At the conclusion of his second trial a jury found defendant Juan A. Merced guilty as charged of the attempted premeditated murder of a peace officer involving the personal use of a firearm (Pen. Code, §§ 187, 664, subd. (e), 12022.5, subd. (a)) and being a past-convicted felon in possession of a firearm (Pen. Code, § 12021, subd. (a)). After finding true allegations that defendant had eight prior felony convictions, the trial court sentenced defendant to state prison for a total term of 65 years to life. Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal. In the published portion of this opinion, we reject defendant’s contention that the removal of a prospective juror is to be judged by the same standard for removal of a juror during deliberations. We further conclude that when the prospective juror has expressed a willingness to engage in jury nullification, the trial court is not required to undertake an inquiry into whether the particular details of the case to be tried present a tangible likelihood that, if seated and sworn, the prospective jurors will nullify.

Background

Establishing the pertinent circumstances of the crimes does not require a lengthy narrative because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.