Bonifield

Bonifield v. County of Nevada

Bad Law
114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 207·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 2933·2001 Daily Journal DAR 12769·94 Cal. App. 4th 298·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10202
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 7, 2001C037881California2,721 words

Opinion

Opinion

Scotland, J.

Sandra Bonifield, individually and as the guardian of Jessica Rose Saunders-Krueger, and the Estate of Kimberly Anne Saunders (collectively plaintiffs) brought this wrongful death action after dismissing their related federal action without prejudice. Defendants demurred on the ground that the state action was untimely. The superior court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend and entered a judgment of dismissal.

On appeal, plaintiffs contend (1) the state action was timely because the statute of limitations was tolled during the pendency of the federal action, which never was effectively dismissed, and (2) in any event, the state action was timely under the principles of California’s equitable tolling doctrine.

We conclude the superior court acted properly in sustaining the demurrer and entering a judgment of dismissal, although not for the reasons stated in Kolani v. Gluska (1998) 64 Cal.App.4th 402 [ 75 Cal.Rptr.2d 257 ] (hereafter Kolani). As we will explain, we believe that Kolani was wrongly decided.

Factual and Procedural Background

Early in the morning of October 27, 1996, Kimberly Anne Saunders “became missing” while traveling on a road between two…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.