Balikov

Balikov v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

Good Law
114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 614·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 2278·2001 Daily Journal DAR 13125·94 Cal. App. 4th 816·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10574
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 20, 2001B145610California1,778 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lillie, J.

Raymond Balikov appeals from judgment entered dismissing his complaint against Southern California Gas Company (the Gas Company), following the sustaining, without leave to amend, the demurrer of the Gas Company. Balikov contends the court erred, because Public Utilities Code section 799, subdivision (a)(4), does not apply and because Los Angeles Municipal Code section 21.1.5 does not provide for imposition of a tax on the subject charges.

Statement of Facts and Procedural History

On February 9, 2000, Balikov, an individual, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public filed a complaint for breach of contract, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, an accounting, unfair and unlawful business practices, and unjust enrichment against the Gas Company and City of Los Angeles. It was alleged, in pertinent part, to be a class action lawsuit on behalf of the general public and all persons and entities who use or have used the Gas Company as their gas provider and who have been improperly charged money by the Gas Company on the State Regulatory Fee and the CARE Fund Surcharge, which the Gas Company represented as a Los…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.