De Anza Santa Cruz Mobile Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. De Anza Santa Cruz Mobile Estates

Good Law
114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 708·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 3411·2001 Daily Journal DAR 13201·94 Cal. App. 4th 890·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10660
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 2001H020036California13,204 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bamattre-Manoukian, J.

In this action by a mobile-home homeowners association against the owners of the mobilehome park, a jury awarded punitive damages in the amount of $6 million after the trial court instructed the jury that it was “an established fact” that defendants had violated Civil Code section 798.41, causing actual damages of $36,401.85, which had already been paid. The trial court subsequently awarded plaintiff attorney’s fees pursuant to Civil Code section 798.85, in the amount of $700,000. On appeal defendants raise the following arguments:

1) The superior court’s jurisdiction is preempted by the Public Utilities Commission;

2) Plaintiff is not entitled to punitive damages for a violation of section 798.41, because the statutory remedies contained in Civil Code section 798.86 are the exclusive remedies for violations of provisions of the Mobilehome Residency Law;

3) The punitive damages award impermissibly punished defendants for defending an arguable position on a complex legal issue, for pursuing authorized remedies in the courts and before other tribunals, and for their attorney’s “hardball” litigation tactics;

4) The punitive damages award was excessive as a matter of law;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.