Solis

Solis v. Kirkwood Resort Co.

Caution
114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 265·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 3090·2001 Daily Journal DAR 12803·94 Cal. App. 4th 354·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10304
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 10, 2001C036987California4,170 words

Opinion

Opinion

Morrison, J.

Mario (plaintiff) and Janelle Solis sued Kirkwood Resort Company (defendant, the true name of which is Kirkwood Mountain Resort, LLC), after a ski accident. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, finding plaintiff signed a release of negligence liability which embraced this accident, and that defendant owed no duty to plaintiff under the primary assumption of the risk rule. Plaintiff filed a timely notice of appeal from the ensuing judgment.

We conclude plaintiff established an ambiguity in the release and a jury could find it was not intended to cover this accident. Moreover, there is a critical factual question regarding whether defendant increased the risk of harm to skiers beyond that inherent in the sport. We reverse.

Standard of Review

Summary judgment is properly granted to a defendant who shows without refutation that a plaintiff cannot establish an essential element of his cause of action or that there is an affirmative defense which bars recovery: Our review is de novo. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subds. (n), (o)(2); Jambazian v. Borden (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 836, 844 [ 30 Cal.Rptr.2d 768 ].)

Factual and Procedural Background

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.