Brown

Brown v. Williams

Bad Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 93·2000 Daily Journal DAR 1623·78 Cal. App. 4th 182·92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 634·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1134
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 2000B128760California3,113 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

La Tanya Brown (plaintiff) allegedly was injured when she slipped and fell down three stairs on premises owned by Maurice and Rosemary Williams (defendants). Plaintiff filed suit against defendants, and was awarded nothing by the judicial arbitrator, then failed to timely request a trial de novo. Thus, the arbitration award became final.

Plaintiff sought relief from her failure to timely request a trial de novo pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b) and California Rules of Court, rule 1615(d), on the ground that it was due to the neglect of her attorney, and that such neglect entitled her to mandatory relief. The relief she requested was (1) to be allowed to file her belated request for trial de novo, and (2) to vacate the arbitration award. The trial court denied her motion for relief, and she now appeals from that order.

Factual and Procedural Background

Plaintiff sued defendants, who answered her complaint. At the July 1998 status conference, the case was ordered into judicial arbitration, which was to be concluded by September 30, 1998. Plaintiff’s counsel did not appear at the status conference, but notice of the ruling was served on him…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.