Issod

Mike Davidov Company v. Issod

Good Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 123·2000 Daily Journal DAR 2019·78 Cal. App. 4th 597·92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 897·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1446
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 2000B130661California5,224 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

The defendant Steven Issod, was sued by the Mike Davidov Company, which is owned by Mike Davidov (plaintiff), for fraud and breach of contract after defendant failed to return a diamond to plaintiff. Following a bench trial, the court ruled in favor of plaintiff, and awarded him $20,301 in compensatory damages on the fraud cause of action, and $96,000 in punitive damages. We conclude that the judgment is amply supported by the record, and that the award of punitive damages was proper even though plaintiff did not produce evidence of defendant’s financial condition. As defendant failed to obey a court order requiring him to produce records of his financial condition, he is estopped to object to the absence of such evidence.

Factual and Procedural Background

On February 22, 1995, defendant telephoned plaintiff and asked plaintiff to send over two diamonds. Defendant represented to plaintiff that he had a customer present in his office at the time of the telephone call, and that this customer was interested in buying a diamond of a particular size and quality.

Both plaintiff and defendant are active members of the diamond industry. Plaintiff has been in the diamond…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.