Lorig

Lorig v. Medical Board

Good Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 108·2000 Daily Journal DAR 1831·78 Cal. App. 4th 462·92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 862·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1306
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 2000A086261California3,496 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sepulveda, J.

Milton Lorig and Michael Burton are physicians licensed by respondent Medical Board of California (the Board). Lorig and Burton are also members of the Union of American Physicians and Dentists (the Union), which is the recognized bargaining representative for approximately 2,000 physicians and dentists employed by the State of California and nine political subdivisions. Lorig, Burton, and the Union (collectively appellants) timely appeal from a judgment by which the San Francisco Superior Court denied their request for injunctive and declaratory relief, and dismissed their complaint. The issue presented is whether the Board violated the Information Practices Act (Civ. Code, § 1798 et seq. (IPA)), or the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq. (CPRA)), by posting appellants’ names and “addresses of record” on its Internet Web site. The trial court ruled that the address of record filed with the Board by a licensed physician is an item of public information, and that disclosure of that information on respondents’ Web site gives rise to no triable issue of fact with respect to any violation of the IPA or the CPRA. We agree, and will affirm.

I. Factual and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.