Clem

People v. Clem

Good Law
78 Cal. App. 4th 346·92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 727
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 2000A082187California3,086 words

Opinion

Opinion

In this appeal we hold that grossly negligent discharge of a firearm in violation of Penal Code section 246.3 is an offense "inherently dangerous to human life" which will support a conviction of second degree felony murder.

On May 18, 1997, appellant James Clem fired a rifle out of the window of his second story apartment, and the bullet struck and killed a man standing in the street below. Appellant testified that he had been assaulted by the victim earlier that day, and only intended to frighten the victim when he fired the fatal shot. Appellant was convicted by a jury of second degree murder and other offenses, and was sentenced to a total of 24 years to life in state prison. The jury was instructed that it could consider several theories of second degree murder, including second degree felony murder based on a violation of Penal Code section 246.3. [1] The sole issue on appeal is whether this felony-murder instruction was proper.

"The felony-murder rule imputes the requisite malice for a murder conviction to those who commit a homicide during the perpetration of a felony inherently dangerous to human life." ( People v. Hansen (1994) 9 Cal.4th 300, 308 , 36…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.