Dozier

People v. Dozier

Bad Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 168·2000 Daily Journal DAR 2591·78 Cal. App. 4th 1195·93 Cal. Rptr. 2d 600·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1911
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 8, 2000B115370, B115593California3,565 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment following his convictions for attempted premeditated murder and being a felon in possession of a firearm. The principal issue in this appeal is the correct method of calculating the minimum term of the indeterminate life sentence for a third strike offender when the punishment otherwise provided for the current offense is life imprisonment with possibility of parole. (Pen. Code, §§ 664, subd. (a), 667, subd. (e)(2)(A).)

In our prior opinion, we held the trial court must select the minimum term of the indeterminate life sentence from the options provided in section 667, subdivision (e)(2)(A)(ii) (25 years) or (iii) (as relevant here, the period prescribed by § 3046). The Supreme Court granted review of our opinion and subsequently remanded the cause to us for reconsideration in light of People v. Jefferson (1999) 21 Cal.4th 86 [ 86 Cal.Rptr.2d 893 , 980 P.2d 441 ]. Jefferson involved the calculation of the minimum term for a second strike offender when the punishment otherwise provided for the current offense is life imprisonment with possibility of parole. (§§ 664, subd. (a), 667, subd. (e)(1).)

In the published portion of this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.