Calderon

People v. Calderon

Good Law
124 Cal. App. 4th 80·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1920·2004 Daily Journal DAR 13895·21 Cal. Rptr. 3d 92·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10205
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 16, 2004B167621California4,363 words

Opinion

Opinion

Woods, J.

Appellant Raymond Calderon timely appealed from an order of the trial court finding him to be a sexually violent predator (SVP) and committing him to the custody of the State Department of Mental Health (DMH) for two years pursuant to the Sexually Violent Predators Act (SVPA). (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.) We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On November 20, 1998, the Los Angeles County District Attorney filed a petition for civil commitment of appellant pursuant to the SVPA. The petition alleged appellant met the criteria as an SVP within the meaning of section 6600, subdivision (a): (1) he had two convictions for rape by force occurring on December 7 and 8, 1981; (2) he currently had a diagnosed mental disorder; and (3) he posed a danger to the health and safety of others.

Appellant demanded a jury trial during which the jury’s sole task was to determine whether appellant was an SVP. At trial, five expert witnesses testified, two on behalf of the People and three on behalf of appellant.

I. People’s Case-in-chief

A. Dr Steen’s Testimony

Dr. Charlene Steen, a psychologist, evaluated appellant and concluded he was an SVP. During the interview, she…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.