Lujan
Lujan v. Minagar
Opinion
Opinion
Rubin, J.
State Labor Commissioner Arthur S. Lujan appeals from the judgment dismissing his action against Shala Minagar for retaliatory job termination under the state’s Occupational Safety and Health Act. (Lab. Code, § 6310.) For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand with directions to enter a new and different judgment in favor of the Labor Commissioner, including a determination of the amount of damages, if any.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Shala Minagar owns a beauty salon in Malibu. On September 7, 1999, Minagar’s shop was inspected and cited for several minor workplace safety violations under the California Occupational Safety and Health Act. (Lab. Code, § 6300 et seq. (Cal-OSHA).) The inspection came in response to a complaint by Susan Grana, who worked as a facialist at the salon. Minagar fired both Grana and hair stylist Noelle Dianella that same day.
In response, the state Labor Commissioner (the Commissioner) cited Minagar for firing Dianella in retaliation for the Cal-OSHA complaint. (§ 6310.) Minagar’s appeal to the Department of Industrial Relations was rejected and Minagar was ordered to rehire Dianella with backpay. When Minagar refused to comply,…