Wilshire Ins. Co. v. SENTRY SELECT INS. CO.

Good Law
124 Cal. App. 4th 27·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1909·2004 Daily Journal DAR 10189·21 Cal. Rptr. 3d 60
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 2004G033136California3,285 words

Opinion

Opinion

On cross-motions for summary judgment, the court applied Insurance Code, section 11580.9, subdivision (d), [1] and declared Wilshire Insurance Company, Inc. (Wilshire) entitled to contribution from Sentry Select Insurance Company (Sentry) [2] in the amount of one-half the expenses incurred by Wilshire in defending and settling a wrongful death action. Sentry appeals the judgment arguing the statute does not apply to the stipulated facts, but if it does, it was misapplied. Finding no error, we affirm.

Because the parties based their respective motions for summary judgment on a joint statement of stipulated facts, we confine our summary of the facts to the matters contained in their stipulation, including the exhibits.

In July 1999, Ken Holm, dba Kenway Enterprises (Kenway), was driving a 1989 Kenworth tractor (the tractor) hauling a 1981 Great Dane semi-trailer (the trailer) when the tractor-trailer rig was involved in an accident causing bodily injury and death. A wrongful death action was filed in the Orange County Superior Court against, inter alia, Kenway (the owner of the tractor) and Statewide Transportation (the owner of the trailer) (Statewide). At the time of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.