Maintain Our Desert Environment v. Town of Apple Valley

Good Law
124 Cal. App. 4th 430·15 Cal. Rptr. 3d 322
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 2, 2004E033904California6,820 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ramirez, J.

Plaintiff Maintain Our Desert Environment (MODE) appeals from the denial of its petition for a writ of mandate seeking to compel defendant Town of Apple Valley (Town) to set aside actions that it took to approve a development project (Project) proposed by real party in interest, Pluto Development, Inc. (Pluto). MODE asserts that the trial court erred when it denied the writ because Town did not comply with mandatory provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) prior to approving the Project. We disagree and affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

After first conducting some preliminary investigations relative to the site, on October 9, 2001, Pluto submitted applications to Town for permits to construct the Project, a 1.2-million-square-foot distribution center with related outbuildings, on a 300-acre site on the southeast corner of Dale Evans Parkway and Johnson Road in Town. At that time, Lilbum Corporation submitted an initial environmental study for the Project, finding that it may have a significant effect on the environment and that an environmental impact report (EIR) was required.

On October 12, 2001, Town…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.