Rollingwood Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Bohannon v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Good Law
190 F.2d 263·40 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1006·1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3910
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 195112728, 12729California2,459 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bone, J.

The question to be determined by the petitions for review of a decision of the Tax Court is whether that court erred in determining that the proceeds from the sale of certain houses by the Rollingwood Corporation should be taxed as ordinary income instead of gains from the sale of capital assets. The applicable statutory provision is Section 117(j) of Title 26 U.S.C.A., as added by 'Section 151(b) of the Revenue Act of 1942, which provides in part:

“(j) Gains and losses from involuntary conversion and from the sale or exchange of certain property used in the trade or business

“(1) Definition of property used in the trade or business. For the purposes of this subsection, the term ‘property used in the trade or business’ means property used in the trade or business, of a character which is subject to the allowance for depreciation provided in section 23(1), held for more than 6 months, and real property used in the trade or business, held for more than 6 months, which is not (A) property of a kind which would properly be includible in the inventory of the taxpayer if on hand at the close of the taxable year, or (B) property held by the taxpayer primarily for sale to customers in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.