In Re Aven S.

People v. Aven S.

Caution
1 Cal. App. 4th 69·1 Cal. Rptr. 2d 655·1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1341·91 Daily Journal DAR 14409
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 22, 1991A050778California2,775 words

Opinion

Opinion

Low, J.

In this case we consider and reject a minor’s claim that the voluntariness of his confession should have been evaluated under a fundamentally different standard of proof than is applicable to adult criminal defendants. We hold that in juvenile cases, as in prosecutions of adults, the People need only prove voluntariness by a preponderance of the evidence.

Aven S., age 15 at the time of his confession, appeals from a jurisdictional order declaring him to be a ward of the juvenile court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) based upon findings that he had committed murder, residential robbery, attempted murder and assault (Pen. Code, §§ 187, 212.5, 245, 664), and from the dispositional order which followed. We affirm.

Manuel Uribe was shot in the head by a person who had ostensibly come to his apartment to buy marijuana from him, and some of his marijuana was taken. John Ferguson, Sr., heard a gunshot, then saw two young men come out of the building. One, whom he identified as the minor, was tucking what appeared to be a black handgun into his waistband. Ferguson turned his back and ran, heard a gunshot, and found he had been shot in the hand.

In his tape-recorded statement to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.