Anderson

CAPACCIOLI, Acting P.J. —

Defendant Mark Carlton Anderson appeals from a judgment entered after he pled guilty to driving under the influence (DUI) and driving with a suspended license. (Veh. Code, §§ 23152, subd. (a) and 14601.2, subd. (a).) [1] Pursuant to his plea bargain, defendant moved to strike an alleged 1987 DUI conviction on the ground that the underlying guilty plea was obtained in violation of his Boykin-Tahl [2] rights. He now contends the trial court should have stricken the 1987 prior because the record of that conviction fails to demonstrate that he expressly and explicitly waived his rights before pleading guilty. We affirm the judgment.

At the hearing on defendant's motion to strike, the People introduced a docket sheet indicating that in 1987 defendant pled guilty to driving under the influence (§ 23152, subd. (a); § 41403, subd. (b)(2)). The clerk's notations on the docket sheet also indicate that defendant was present without an attorney, and pursuant to a mass advisement, he was informed of his rights [3] and the charges and the various pleas available to him.

The docket sheet further states, "Defendant advised of, understands, and knowingly and…