Stanley

Cummings v. Stanley

Bad Law
177 Cal. App. 4th 493·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1484·99 Cal. Rptr. 3d 284
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 2009A123743California8,146 words

Opinion

Opinion

Graham, J.

Plaintiff brought the present action pursuant to Elections Code sections 16100, subdivision (b), and 16440, subdivision (a), to contest the eligibility of defendants Walter Stanley III, Lea Smart, Casey Fargo, Deslar Patten, Christopher Kuhn, John W. Bartlett, and David Latour, for election to positions on the Alameda County Republican Central Committee (the Committee). The trial court dismissed the action on the ground that plaintiff failed to file the action within the statutory five-day time limit for primary election contests. We conclude that an election of party central committee members is not a primary election and is governed by a 30-day time limit to file a contest to elections other than primary elections. We therefore find that plaintiff timely filed his election contest, and reverse the judgment.

Statement of Factual and Procedural History

On June 3, 2008, defendants were elected as members of the Committee from various districts within Alameda County. On July 8, 2008, the “official canvass” for the election was completed by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors, and defendants were declared elected to office as members of the Committee. Plaintiff was a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.