Hunter-Bloor

Starlight Ridge South Homeowners Assn. v. Hunter-Bloor

Good Law
177 Cal. App. 4th 440·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1480·99 Cal. Rptr. 3d 20
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 14, 2009E046457California4,857 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Starlight Ridge South Homeowners Association (the Association) is the owners association of a common interest development. Defendant and respondent Stephanie K. Hunter-Bloor (the homeowner) is the owner of a residential lot in the development. The Association claimed that the homeowner was responsible for upkeep and maintenance of a portion of a drainage channel (the V-ditch) crossing her lot. The homeowner contended that, instead, the Association was responsible for the costs of maintaining the section of the V-ditch crossing her property, because at that location the V-ditch section was wholly contained within a landscape maintenance area, and the Association was charged with the duty of maintaining the landscape maintenance area. The Association filed an action against the homeowner for injunctive and declaratory relief. Each party filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court, interpreting the covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&R’s), granted the homeowner’s summary judgment motion and entered judgment in favor of the homeowner. The Association has appealed, contending that the trial court erred in its interpretation of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.